![]() Hazony’s new book, Conservatism: A Rediscovery, presents a complete case for what he understands Anglo-American conservatism to be: He offers an interpretation of history, a philosophical foundation, a discussion of policy, and-perhaps most important-an account of what this conservatism means at the personal level, in his own experience and for others.Ī very different way of describing conservatism is found in Matthew Continetti’s The Right: The Hundred-Year War for American Conservatism. and Europe launched what he called “national conservatism.” Hazony championed the nation-state and generally took a nationalist line on trade, immigration, and foreign policy-which is to say, he has been skeptical of free trade, opposed to open borders, and critical of international institutions and idealistic military ventures overseas. His 2018 book, The Virtue of Nationalism, and a series of conferences he organized in the U.S. Conservative intellectual orthodoxy no longer mattered, so a number of politically unorthodox thinkers began to make arguments for a new right. He campaigned in 2016 as a right-wing populist, neither libertarian nor technocratic and certainly not what Bush Republicans would consider “compassionate.” Unlike Bush and the neoconservatives, who went to great lengths to brand themselves as faithful successors to Ronald Reagan, Trump cared little for the appearance of continuity. A little less than ten years ago, the right was supposedly in the midst of a “libertarian moment,” and the Tea Party’s only rival appeared to be a high-minded and technocratic “reform conservatism.” Bush and the hawkish foreign-policy views of the neoconservatives were ascendant. Twenty years ago, the “compassionate conservatism” of George W. The Hundred-Year War for American ConservatismĪmerican conservatism has been a remarkably unstable thing since the end of the Cold War.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |